SACA
Welcome
SACA Prototype Evaluation
Security Audit Compliance Agent — FGD Questionnaire
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) + Human Agency Scale (HAS)

This questionnaire has three stages. Please complete each stage at the time indicated by the facilitator. There are no right or wrong answers — your candid professional opinion is what matters.
1
Stage 1 — Before the demo (10–15 min)
Background, current practices, and prior expectations of AI in audit
2
Stage 2 — During the demo (20–30 min)
Immediate reactions to each prototype task, then facilitated group discussion
3
Stage 3 — After the demo (15–20 min)
TAM constructs, Human Agency Scale, zone mapping, and reflections
Strictly confidential · For research purposes only · Participation is voluntary
Any questions? obrina@doctrineuk.org
Made in the UK by OCB · Copyleft ©2026
Stage 1 of 3 — Pre-FGD

Registration & Pre-FGD Questionnaire

Enter your email and select your FGD session, then complete the questions below. Estimated time: 10–15 minutes.

📋 Registration
Section A
Demographic & Professional Background

Section B
Current Audit Practices & Pain Points
Rate each statement: 1 = Strongly Disagree → 5 = Strongly Agree

Section C
Prior Expectations of AI-Assisted Audit Tools
Rate each statement before you see the demonstration.
🔐
FGD Day Access

Enter the same email address you used during registration to retrieve your Participant ID and begin Stages 2 & 3.

Stage 2 of 3 — During FGD

During the Demo

Record your immediate reactions after each demonstration step. The facilitator will guide the timing.

⚡ Complete each task block immediately after watching that step — before moving to the next one. Keep responses brief; depth comes in Stage 3.
Section D
Task-Level Reactions

Section E
Group Discussion — Key Points
The facilitator will lead discussion on each prompt. Jot down key points or quotes you want to remember — these are for your own reference and will be captured separately by the facilitator.
Stage 3 of 3 — Post-FGD

After the Demo

Complete this section after the demonstration and group discussion. Estimated time: 15–20 minutes. Scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree → 5 = Strongly Agree unless stated otherwise.

Section F — TAM
Perceived Usefulness

Section G — TAM
Perceived Ease of Use

Section H — TAM
Trust & Explainability

Section I — HAS
Human Agency Scale
The HAS (Shao et al., Stanford 2025) measures the degree of human involvement needed when AI assists with a task.
LevelTeam dynamicHuman involvementAI role
H1AI drives taskNone requiredAutomation
H2AI drives taskMinimal — key checkpointsAutomation
H3Equal partnershipCollaborate throughoutAugmentation
H4Human drives taskAI needs your inputAugmentation
H5Human drives taskContinuous involvementAugmentation
Consider both the benefit of freeing up your time AND concerns about professional control or job displacement.
Rate how strongly each dimension applies to IT audit compliance work using this prototype.
Considering ALL the audit tasks as a whole, which single HAS level best describes your overall preferred level of collaboration?

Section J — TAM
Behavioral Intention to Adopt

Section K — HAS
Desire–Capability Zone Mapping
For each audit task, assign it to one of four zones based on your assessment of AI capability and your desire for automation today. 🟢 Green Light = High desire + High capability (deploy now) · 🔴 Red Light = Capable but I resist · 🟡 R&D Opportunity = I want it but not ready · ⚪ Low Priority = Low on both

Section L
Open-Ended Reflections
Thank you!

Your Stage 1 responses have been submitted and saved successfully.

Your professional insight is invaluable for improving AI-assisted IT audit tools that genuinely serve the practitioner community.

📋 What happens next?

On the day of the FGD, you will receive an email with the Teams link.
You will use the same email address you registered with to retrieve your Participant ID and access Stages 2 and 3 during the session.

You can safely close this page now.
Participant ID: